LangSmith vs Phoenix: Observability, Prompts & Evals Comparison
Compare LangSmith and Phoenix side by side. Both are tools in the Observability, Prompts & Evals category.
Updated March 9, 2026
The short answer
Choose LangSmith if deep integration with LangChain framework provides unmatched observability for LangChain applications.
Choose Phoenix if open-source with active development by Arize.
Quick Comparison
| Category | Observability, Prompts & Evals | Observability, Prompts & Evals |
| Pricing | Freemium | Open Source |
| Best For | LangChain developers who need integrated tracing, evaluation, and prompt management | Engineering teams building agent and RAG systems who want OpenTelemetry-native observability with both self-hosted and managed options |
| Website | smith.langchain.com | phoenix.arize.com |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Use Cases |
|
|
Pros & Cons: LangSmith vs Phoenix
- +Deep integration with LangChain framework provides unmatched observability for LangChain applications
- +Comprehensive evaluation capabilities with custom metrics and automated regression testing
- +Excellent tracing UI with detailed step-by-step execution visualization
- +Strong dataset management and annotation workflows for human feedback
- −Tight coupling to LangChain ecosystem limits flexibility for non-LangChain applications
- −UI scalability issues reported when working with very large datasets
- −Production testing limitations - relies primarily on production logs for test datasets
- −SaaS-only deployment with no self-hosting option may not suit all enterprise requirements
- +Open-source with active development by Arize
- +OpenTelemetry-native (no proprietary trace format lock-in)
- +Strong evaluator library out of the box
- +Both self-hosted and managed cloud options available
- +Upgrade path to full Arize enterprise platform
- −Smaller community than Langfuse for open-source-first teams
- −Cloud version's enterprise pricing is contact-sales only
- −UI and feature set tilt toward ML engineers more than application developers
Pricing: LangSmith vs Phoenix
- · 5,000 traces per month
- · 14-day retention
- · One seat
- · Basic evaluations
- · 100,000 traces (overage ~$0.50 per 1,000)
- · 400-day retention
- · Full evaluations
- · Custom dashboards
- · Custom trace volumes
- · Custom retention policies
- · SSO
- · Dedicated support
When to Choose LangSmith vs Phoenix
- Debugging LangChain and LangGraph applications
- Prompt iteration and A/B testing
- LLM output evaluation and scoring
- OpenTelemetry-native LLM observability
- Hallucination detection for RAG
- Experiment tracking and golden-set evaluation
About LangSmith
LangSmith is LangChain's observability and evaluation platform for building production-grade LLM applications. Founded in July 2023 by Harrison Chase and Ankush Gola as part of the LangChain ecosystem, LangSmith provides comprehensive tracing of every LLM call, chain execution, and agent step with detailed visibility into inputs, outputs, latency, token usage, and cost. The platform includes annotation queues for human feedback, dataset management for systematic evaluation, and regression testing capabilities for prompt changes. With over 1 million developers using LangChain products globally, LangSmith has become the go-to debugging and monitoring tool for teams building with the LangChain framework, serving major enterprises including Klarna, LinkedIn, Replit, GitLab, Elastic, and Cisco.
About Phoenix
Phoenix is the open-source observability and evaluation platform built by Arize AI for LLM and agent applications. It is OpenTelemetry-native, which means traces written through Phoenix can flow into any OTel-compatible backend in addition to Phoenix's own UI. The platform includes built-in evaluators for hallucination detection, retrieval relevance, and QA correctness, plus dataset management and prompt playground features. Phoenix can be deployed via Docker for self-hosting or used in Arize's managed cloud. The open-source core makes it attractive to teams that want to inspect and customize the observability layer, while the integration with the full Arize platform provides an upgrade path for organizations that need enterprise features like RBAC, SSO, and SLA-backed support.
What is Observability, Prompts & Evals?
Tools for monitoring LLM applications in production, managing and versioning prompts, and evaluating model outputs. Includes tracing, logging, cost tracking, prompt engineering platforms, automated evaluation frameworks, and human annotation workflows.
Browse all Observability, Prompts & Evalstools →