Skip to main content
Introducing Respan Router

LangSmith vs Respan (2026)

Updated March 9, 2026

vs

Overview

Rating
10.0 / 10
Rating
10.0 / 10
Best For
Teams building agents on LangChain or LangGraph who want tracing, evals, and deployment from one vendor
Best For
Engineering and product teams running AI agents and LLM apps in production
Product Summary

LangSmith is LangChain's platform for tracing, evaluating, and deploying AI agents. Compare its features, pricing, pros and cons, and alternatives.

Product Summary

Respan is LLM observability built into an AI router: nested traces for every agent run, evals on live production traffic, and a click from any score to its trace.

Starting Price
Free
Starting Price
$0
Free Trial
Yes
Free Trial
Yes
Free Version
Yes
Free Version
Yes
Website

Key features

Core capabilities each platform advertises.

LangSmithLangSmith
  • Native tracing for LangChain and LangGraph
  • OpenTelemetry and multi-language SDKs
  • Offline and online evaluations
  • Annotation queues and datasets
  • Prompt Hub with versioning
RespanRespan
  • Nested traces for every LLM call, tool run, and agent turn
  • Threads for multi-turn sessions
  • Online evals on live production traffic
  • LLM-judge, code, and human evaluators
  • Datasets from production logs and experiments at scale
  • Monitors with Slack, email, and webhook alerts
  • Prompt versioning and deployment without code changes

Strengths and tradeoffs

What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.

LangSmithLangSmith

Pros

  • Native LangChain and LangGraph tracing with no extra instrumentation
  • Evals, datasets, and annotation queues sit in the same workspace as traces
  • Tracing, deployment, and sandboxes from one vendor
  • Framework-agnostic SDKs and OpenTelemetry support

Cons

  • Per-seat pricing on Plus, and the free plan allows one seat
  • 14-day base retention, with longer retention billed at a higher rate
  • LLM Gateway is still in beta
  • Self-hosting and hybrid deployment are Enterprise only
RespanRespan

Pros

  • Every score links to the trace that produced it
  • Evals run on live production traffic, not only on test sets
  • Built into the router, so there's no separate gateway to integrate
  • Monitors alert the moment a metric breaches
  • Unlimited seats on the free plan

Cons

  • The free plan retains data for 7 days
  • The free plan includes 1k scores and 2 evaluators
  • Ingestion throughput is metered per tier, starting at 412 logs per minute on Free

LangSmith or Respan — which should you choose?

Choose LangSmith if you want

  • Debugging LangChain and LangGraph agents
  • Evaluating agent output against datasets
  • Human review through annotation queues
  • Deploying long-running agents

Choose Respan if you want

  • Debugging agent failures down to the step that broke
  • Catching quality regressions before users report them
  • Turning production failures into test datasets
  • Testing a prompt or model change against real cases before shipping
  • Attributing LLM cost to each end customer

Compare LangSmith and Respan on your own traffic

10KFree traces/mo
1,000+Models
5 minSetup

Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 1,000+ models through one gateway.

Try Respan free

Other popular comparisons