LangSmith vs Weights & Biases (2026)
Updated March 9, 2026
Overview
LangSmith is LangChain's platform for tracing, evaluating, and deploying AI agents. Compare its features, pricing, pros and cons, and alternatives.
Weights & Biases (W&B) is the leading experiment tracking and ML operations platform, now extended to LLM applications. W&B Traces provides observability for LLM pipelines, while W&B Weave offers evaluation and production monitoring. The platform also supports model training tracking, hyperparameter sweeps, and artifact management, making it a comprehensive MLOps solution.
Key features
Core capabilities each platform advertises.
- Native tracing for LangChain and LangGraph
- OpenTelemetry and multi-language SDKs
- Offline and online evaluations
- Annotation queues and datasets
- Prompt Hub with versioning
- ML experiment tracking
- Model and dataset versioning
- Collaborative dashboards
- Sweeps for hyperparameter tuning
- Prompt monitoring and evaluation
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- Native LangChain and LangGraph tracing with no extra instrumentation
- Evals, datasets, and annotation queues sit in the same workspace as traces
- Tracing, deployment, and sandboxes from one vendor
- Framework-agnostic SDKs and OpenTelemetry support
Cons
- Per-seat pricing on Plus, and the free plan allows one seat
- 14-day base retention, with longer retention billed at a higher rate
- LLM Gateway is still in beta
- Self-hosting and hybrid deployment are Enterprise only
Pros
- Free tier for personal projects and academic research provides excellent value
- Comprehensive experiment tracking and model versioning capabilities
- Strong visualization tools help teams understand model performance
- Acquisition by CoreWeave provides infrastructure synergies and stability
Cons
- Pricing can become expensive for large teams and enterprises
- Additional storage costs can add up quickly for data-intensive workflows
- Learning curve for advanced features may slow initial adoption
- Platform complexity may be overkill for simple ML projects
LangSmith or Weights & — which should you choose?
Choose LangSmith if you wantChoose if you want
- Debugging LangChain and LangGraph agents
- Evaluating agent output against datasets
- Human review through annotation queues
- Deploying long-running agents
Choose Weights & if you wantChoose if you want
- ML experiment tracking and comparison
- Model training run management
- Team collaboration on ML projects
- Hyperparameter optimization
- Model registry and versioning
Compare LangSmith and Weights & Biases on your own traffic
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 1,000+ models through one gateway.
Try Respan free