Continue vs Kilo Code
Updated April 29, 2026
Overview
Continue is the leading open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains, with autocomplete, chat, edit, and agent capabilities powered by any LLM you choose — Claude, GPT-4, Mistral, or local models via Ollama. Free OSS extension plus a Hub for source-controlled prompts, rules, and CI checks; paid plans from $10/mo.
Kilo Code is an open-source AI coding agent for VS Code, JetBrains, and the CLI, forked from Cline and Roo Code. It connects to 500+ models across 60+ providers with zero markup, and ships an Orchestrator mode that routes complex tasks to specialist sub-agents (Architect, Coder, Debugger). 1.5M+ users; raised $8M seed in December 2025.
Key features
Core capabilities each platform advertises.
- Autocomplete, chat, edit, and agent modes in VS Code and JetBrains
- Bring any LLM — Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Mistral, or local Ollama
- Source-controlled config: prompts, rules, and context providers live in the repo
- Continue Hub for shared assistants, rules, and CI-enforceable AI checks
- On-prem, cloud, or fully offline deployment for compliance-sensitive teams
- Orchestrator mode routes complex tasks to specialist sub-agents (Architect / Coder / Debugger)
- 500+ models across 60+ providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Mistral, Ollama, OpenRouter)
- Runs in VS Code, JetBrains, and as a standalone CLI
- Inline autocomplete, browser automation, and automated refactoring
- Open-source (forked from Cline + Roo Code) with 1.5M+ active users
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- 100% open-source — no vendor lock-in, fully auditable
- Most flexible model support of any major coding assistant
- Source-controlled AI configuration treats prompts like code
- Strong on-prem / air-gapped story for enterprise
- Active Hub marketplace and community contributions
Cons
- Setup is more involved than turn-key tools like Copilot or Cursor
- UX is functional rather than polished compared to Cursor
- Quality bound to your chosen model — no built-in agent intelligence
- Smaller out-of-the-box integration set than incumbents
Pros
- Most-used open-source coding agent (1.5M+ users, #1 on OpenRouter)
- Zero markup — pays Anthropic/OpenAI/Google list price
- Orchestrator routes complex work to specialist sub-agents
- 500+ models across 60+ providers, including local
- BYOK credits never expire
Cons
- Newer than incumbents like GitHub Copilot — fewer enterprise references
- Quality is bounded by your chosen model and prompt
- Community support rather than dedicated enterprise SLAs
- Orchestrator workflows have a learning curve to configure
What people are saying
Continue.dev isn't the easiest AI coding assistant, and it's not the prettiest, but it's undeniably the most powerful and flexible option available.
Read full reviewBrilliant coding assistant — works great for both VS Code and JetBrains IDEs with access to many providers.
Read full reviewContinue or Kilo Code — which should you choose?
Choose Continue if you wantChoose if you want
- Standardized AI coding workflows across an engineering org
- On-prem or air-gapped development for regulated industries
- BYOK with no markup across many providers
- Source-controlled prompts and rules under code review
- CI gates that enforce AI-output quality before merge
Choose Kilo Code if you wantChoose if you want
- Orchestrated multi-step refactors across an existing codebase
- Cost-conscious AI coding via BYOK with zero provider markup
- Multi-IDE team standardization across VS Code and JetBrains
- Local-first private coding workflows with Ollama
- Architectural planning and automated debugging from a single agent
Compare Continue and Kilo Code on your own traffic
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 500+ models through one gateway.