Skip to main content
Introducing Respan Router

Continue vs Trae (2026)

Updated April 29, 2026

vs

Overview

Rating
10.0 / 10
Rating
10.0 / 10
Best For
Engineering teams that want an open-source, auditable AI coding assistant with full model and deployment freedom
Best For
—
Product Summary

Continue is the leading open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains, with autocomplete, chat, edit, and agent capabilities powered by any LLM you choose — Claude, GPT-4, Mistral, or local models via Ollama. Free OSS extension plus a Hub for source-controlled prompts, rules, and CI checks; paid plans from $10/mo.

Product Summary

Trae is an AI coding platform with TraeCode, an AI IDE with unlimited autocomplete and SOLO mode, and TraeWork for running cloud tasks on web and desktop.

Starting Price
$0Per forever
Starting Price
$3Per month
Free Trial
Yes
Free Trial
Yes
Free Version
Yes
Free Version
No
Website

Key features

Core capabilities each platform advertises.

ContinueContinue
  • Autocomplete, chat, edit, and agent modes in VS Code and JetBrains
  • Bring any LLM — Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Mistral, or local Ollama
  • Source-controlled config: prompts, rules, and context providers live in the repo
  • Continue Hub for shared assistants, rules, and CI-enforceable AI checks
  • On-prem, cloud, or fully offline deployment for compliance-sensitive teams
TraeTrae
  • TraeCode AI IDE with unlimited autocomplete
  • SOLO mode included on every plan
  • TraeWork cloud tasks on web and desktop
  • Up to 20 concurrent cloud tasks on Ultra

Strengths and tradeoffs

What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.

ContinueContinue

Pros

  • 100% open-source — no vendor lock-in, fully auditable
  • Most flexible model support of any major coding assistant
  • Source-controlled AI configuration treats prompts like code
  • Strong on-prem / air-gapped story for enterprise
  • Active Hub marketplace and community contributions

Cons

  • Setup is more involved than turn-key tools like Copilot or Cursor
  • UX is functional rather than polished compared to Cursor
  • Quality bound to your chosen model — no built-in agent intelligence
  • Smaller out-of-the-box integration set than incumbents
TraeTrae

Pros

  • Paid plans start at $3 a month
  • Unlimited autocomplete on every plan
  • SOLO mode included at every tier
  • Concurrent cloud tasks scale from 2 to 20 by plan

Cons

  • Usage is sold as dollar amounts, so it's hard to tell how many tasks a plan covers
  • Trae's site doesn't name the models behind each plan
  • Enterprise plans go through BytePlus rather than Trae directly

What people are saying

ContinueContinue
Alex CarterMedium review

Continue.dev isn't the easiest AI coding assistant, and it's not the prettiest, but it's undeniably the most powerful and flexible option available.

Read full review
TraeTrae
Data not available

Continue or Trae — which should you choose?

Choose Continue if you want

  • Standardized AI coding workflows across an engineering org
  • On-prem or air-gapped development for regulated industries
  • BYOK with no markup across many providers
  • Source-controlled prompts and rules under code review
  • CI gates that enforce AI-output quality before merge

Choose Trae if you want

  • Everyday coding with unlimited autocomplete at a low monthly price
  • Running background coding tasks in the cloud
  • Scaling parallel cloud tasks as a project grows

Compare Continue and Trae on your own traffic

10KFree traces/mo
1,000+Models
5 minSetup

Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 1,000+ models through one gateway.

Try Respan free

Frequently Asked Questions

Other popular comparisons