Devin vs Google Jules: Coding Agents Comparison
Compare Devin and Google Jules side by side. Both are tools in the Coding Agents category.
Updated March 9, 2026
The short answer
Choose Devin if dramatically reduced pricing makes AI coding accessible at USD 20/month.
Choose Google Jules if strong workflow UX with detailed planning and approval process.
Want to compare Devin and Google Jules on your own traffic?
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 250+ models through one gateway. Free tier covers 10K traces per month. Setup in 5 minutes, no credit card.
Quick Comparison
| Category | Coding Agents | Coding Agents |
| Pricing | Enterprise | — |
| Best For | Engineering teams who want a fully autonomous AI software engineer | — |
| Website | devin.ai | jules.google |
| Key Features |
| — |
| Use Cases |
| — |
Pros & Cons: Devin vs Google Jules
- +Dramatically reduced pricing makes AI coding accessible at USD 20/month
- +Strong performance on routine tasks—bug fixes, tests, and glue code
- +Autonomous operation through Slack reduces context switching
- +Proven ROI with companies like Nubank reporting 20x cost savings
- −Completes only 15 percent of complex tasks without human help
- −Gets stuck in technical dead-ends requiring intervention
- −Cannot handle integration conflicts or unclear decision points
- −Tasks take much longer than expected—days instead of hours for straightforward work
- +Strong workflow UX with detailed planning and approval process
- +Adds tests alongside implementations—better than most LLMs
- +Private by default with no training on user code
- +Effective for routine tasks like bug fixes and dependency updates
- −Only 15 daily tasks on free tier severely limits evaluation
- −Struggles with large codebases due to context window limits
- −Not suitable for architectural overhauls or complex features
- −Requires human oversight despite autonomous operation
Pricing: Devin vs Google Jules
- · Pay-as-you-go model
- · USD 2.25 per ACU
- · Light workflows
- · Individual developers
- · 250 ACUs included
- · Predictable monthly cost
- · Team collaboration
- · Consistent workflows
- · SaaS or VPC deployment
- · Complete data isolation
- · Advanced security
- · Compliance features
- · 15 daily tasks
- · 3 concurrent tasks
- · Private by default
- · GitHub integration
- · 100 daily tasks
- · 15 concurrent tasks
- · Gemini 2.5 Pro
- · Priority access to updates
- · 300 daily tasks
- · 60 concurrent tasks
- · Highest priority
- · Premium support
When to Choose Devin vs Google Jules
- End-to-end feature development
- Bug fixing with full autonomy
- Repository-wide migrations
How to Choose a Coding Agents Tool
Key criteria to evaluate when comparing Coding Agents solutions:
About Devin
Devin is an AI software engineer developed by Cognition AI that acts as an autonomous coding agent capable of handling end-to-end software development tasks. Launched in early 2024 and initially priced at USD 500/month for early access, Devin 2.0 dramatically reduced pricing to USD 20/month in April 2025, making it accessible to individual developers and small teams. Devin operates independently through Slack, handling tasks from bug fixes to complex feature implementation. The platform achieved 3x better performance than previous systems on the SWE-bench coding standard and has been used by companies like Nubank, which reported saving 20x the cost on migration tasks. Devin offers three pricing tiers: Core at USD 20/month with pay-as-you-go ACUs at USD 2.25 each, Team at USD 500/month with 250 included ACUs, and custom Enterprise pricing. While Devin excels at routine coding work and tedious tasks, developer feedback reveals it struggles with complex architectural decisions, integration conflicts, and can get stuck in technical dead-ends, completing only 15 percent of complex tasks without human intervention.
About Google Jules
Google Jules is an AI-powered autonomous coding agent launched in general availability in August 2025 following a successful beta testing phase that began in May. Powered by Gemini 2.5 Pro, Google most advanced language model, Jules integrates directly with GitHub to handle bug fixes, test writing, dependency updates, and small feature implementations. The platform presents detailed plans and requests approval before taking action, with a 5-minute timeout for automatic approval if no response is received. Jules offers three pricing tiers: a free Introductory plan with 15 daily tasks and 3 concurrent tasks, Google AI Pro at USD 19.99/month with 100 daily tasks and 15 concurrent tasks, and Google AI Ultra at USD 124.99/month with 300 daily tasks and 60 concurrent tasks. While Jules excels at routine, well-scoped tasks and adds tests alongside implementations, developer feedback reveals performance limitations including underwhelming results on complex features, frustrating context window limits with large codebases, and difficulty with architectural overhauls. Jules functions best as a capable junior developer for routine work but still requires human oversight for correctness and alignment.
What is Coding Agents?
AI-powered developer tools that can write, review, debug, and refactor code—ranging from IDE copilots to fully autonomous software engineering agents.
Browse all Coding Agentstools →Frequently Asked Questions
Other Coding Agents Tools
More Coding Agents Comparisons
Run Coding Agents in production with Respan
One platform for routing, observability, tracing, and evals across every LLM provider.