Skip to main content
Introducing Respan Router

Kiro vs OpenCode (2026)

Updated April 29, 2026

vs

Overview

Rating
10.0 / 10
Rating
10.0 / 10
Best For
Developers who want an AI agent to plan features as specs before writing code
Best For
Developers who want an open-source coding agent across terminal, IDE, and desktop with any model provider
Product Summary

Kiro is AWS's agentic coding tool, with an IDE, CLI, and web app that turn prompts into specs, designs, and task lists before writing the code.

Product Summary

OpenCode is an open-source AI coding agent for the terminal, IDE, and desktop with 75+ LLM providers. Compare its Zen and Go pricing, pros, and cons.

Starting Price
$0
Starting Price
$0Per forever
Free Trial
No
Free Trial
Yes
Free Version
Yes
Free Version
Yes
Website

Key features

Core capabilities each platform advertises.

KiroKiro
  • Spec-driven development: requirements, design, and task lists before code
  • Hooks that run tasks like tests and doc updates in the background
  • Steering files shared across IDE, CLI, and web
  • Models from Anthropic, OpenAI, and open-weight providers, plus Auto mode
OpenCodeOpenCode
  • Terminal UI, desktop app, and IDE extensions
  • 75+ LLM providers via Models.dev, including local models
  • Sign in with GitHub Copilot or ChatGPT Plus/Pro
  • LSP-enabled code understanding
  • Multi-session agents on the same project

Strengths and tradeoffs

What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.

KiroKiro

Pros

  • Free plan with 50 credits a month
  • Spec-driven workflow produces requirements and designs, not just code
  • Choice of Claude, GPT, and open-weight models, with Auto mode
  • Available as an IDE, CLI, web app, and mobile app

Cons

  • Credit multipliers vary by model, so cost per task can be hard to predict
  • Unused monthly credits don't roll over
  • Free plan is limited to open-weight models and Claude Sonnet 4.5 with rate limits
  • Enterprise sign-in runs through AWS IAM Identity Center
OpenCodeOpenCode

Pros

  • Free and open source under MIT
  • Doesn't store code or context data
  • 75+ providers, including local models and existing Copilot or ChatGPT subscriptions
  • Same agent across terminal, desktop, and five IDEs

Cons

  • Zen data retention varies by provider, and OpenAI keeps requests for 30 days
  • Zen credit purchases carry card fees of 4.4% + $0.30
  • Go plans cap usage in 5-hour, weekly, and monthly windows

What people are saying

KiroKiro
Data not available
OpenCodeOpenCode
jeremy_kHacker News

It was the first time I felt like I could write up a large prompt, walk away from my laptop, and come back to a lot of work having been done.

Read full review

Kiro or OpenCode — which should you choose?

Choose Kiro if you want

  • Planning a new feature as a spec before any code is written
  • Running background checks like unit tests on every change
  • Working across an IDE, terminal, and browser with shared project rules
  • Rolling out an AI coding tool to teams already on AWS

Choose OpenCode if you want

  • Terminal-first AI pair programming
  • Privacy-sensitive environments using local models
  • Parallel agent sessions on one codebase
  • BYOK across providers without switching tools

Compare Kiro and OpenCode on your own traffic

10KFree traces/mo
1,000+Models
5 minSetup

Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 1,000+ models through one gateway.

Try Respan free

Frequently Asked Questions

Other popular comparisons