Sourcegraph Cody vs Trae
Updated March 10, 2026
Overview
Cody is Sourcegraph's AI coding assistant that understands your entire codebase. It uses Sourcegraph's code graph to provide context-aware code completions, explanations, and refactoring across massive codebases. Cody supports multiple LLM backends and works in VS Code, JetBrains, and the web.
Trae is an AI-powered IDE developed by ByteDance that offers intelligent code generation, completion, and editing capabilities. Built with deep AI integration, Trae provides features like agentic coding with Builder mode, inline AI assistance, and multi-model support including Claude and GPT. It enables developers to build full applications from natural language prompts, debug code, and automate repetitive tasks directly within the editor, making it a comprehensive AI-native development environment.
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- Free tier with unlimited autocompletion
- Affordable Pro plan at USD 9/month
- IDE integration across popular platforms
- Strong codebase context awareness
Cons
- Pro and Free tiers being discontinued mid-2025
- Transitioning to new Amp product
- Uncertainty around product roadmap
- Enterprise customers only path forward
Pros
- Developer-friendly platform
- Production-ready
- Good performance
- Active development
Cons
- Enterprise pricing varies
- Setup complexity
- Learning curve
Compare Sourcegraph Cody and Trae on your own traffic
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 500+ models through one gateway.