Skip to main content
Introducing Respan Router

Braintrust vs Ragas (2026)

vs

Overview

Rating
10.0 / 10
Rating
10.0 / 10
Best For
Teams that want structured evals, experiments, and datasets tied to production traces
Best For
Developers building RAG applications who need specialized evaluation metrics
Product Summary

Braintrust is an LLM evaluation and observability platform. Compare its evals, tracing, pricing, pros and cons, and alternatives.

Product Summary

Ragas is an open-source evaluation framework specifically designed for RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipelines. It provides metrics for context precision, context recall, faithfulness, and answer relevancy, helping teams measure and improve the quality of their RAG systems. Ragas has become the standard evaluation toolkit for teams building production RAG applications.

Starting Price
Free
Starting Price
Open Source
Free Trial
No
Free Trial
No
Free Version
Yes
Free Version
No
Website

Key features

Core capabilities each platform advertises.

BraintrustBraintrust
  • Experiments comparing prompts and models
  • Code-based and LLM-as-judge scorers
  • Datasets built from production traces
  • Production logging and tracing
RagasRagas
  • RAG-specific evaluation framework
  • Component-wise metrics for RAG
  • Synthetic test data generation
  • LLM-as-judge evaluators
  • Open-source Python library

Strengths and tradeoffs

What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.

BraintrustBraintrust

Pros

  • Unlimited users on every plan, including free
  • Production traces, datasets, and experiments connect in one eval workflow
  • Framework-agnostic SDKs across multiple languages
  • Loop agent drafts scorers and datasets from your own data

Cons

  • Processed data and scores bill separately, and both grow with eval volume
  • 14-day retention on Starter and 30 days on Pro
  • Gateway is in public preview with no SLA
  • Self-hosting and custom data export are Enterprise only
RagasRagas

Pros

  • Specialized focus on RAG evaluation with metrics specifically designed for retrieval systems
  • Open-source framework providing transparency and community-driven development
  • Strong industry endorsement from OpenAI, LangChain, and LlamaIndex
  • Y Combinator backing providing credibility and potential for growth
  • Easy integration with popular frameworks like LangChain and LlamaIndex

Cons

  • Very small team of 3 employees may limit support and feature development
  • Limited to RAG evaluation, not a comprehensive observability solution
  • Minimal funding ($500K) compared to competitors may impact long-term sustainability
  • Lack of clear commercial pricing model for enterprise features

Braintrust or Ragas — which should you choose?

Choose Braintrust if you want

  • Iterating on prompts with production data
  • Running evaluations across model versions
  • Building golden datasets from production traffic
  • Human review of LLM outputs

Choose Ragas if you want

  • Evaluating RAG pipeline quality end-to-end
  • Measuring retrieval precision and recall
  • Testing faithfulness and answer relevance
  • Generating synthetic evaluation datasets
  • Benchmarking RAG across configurations

Compare Braintrust and Ragas on your own traffic

10KFree traces/mo
1,000+Models
5 minSetup

Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 1,000+ models through one gateway.

Try Respan free

Other popular comparisons