Skip to main content
Introducing Respan Router

Braintrust vs Weights & Biases (2026)

Updated March 9, 2026

vs

Overview

Rating
10.0 / 10
Rating
10.0 / 10
Best For
Teams that want structured evals, experiments, and datasets tied to production traces
Best For
ML engineers and researchers who need comprehensive experiment tracking
Product Summary

Braintrust is an LLM evaluation and observability platform. Compare its evals, tracing, pricing, pros and cons, and alternatives.

Product Summary

Weights & Biases (W&B) is the leading experiment tracking and ML operations platform, now extended to LLM applications. W&B Traces provides observability for LLM pipelines, while W&B Weave offers evaluation and production monitoring. The platform also supports model training tracking, hyperparameter sweeps, and artifact management, making it a comprehensive MLOps solution.

Starting Price
Free
Starting Price
Free
Free Trial
No
Free Trial
Yes
Free Version
Yes
Free Version
Yes
Website

Key features

Core capabilities each platform advertises.

BraintrustBraintrust
  • Experiments comparing prompts and models
  • Code-based and LLM-as-judge scorers
  • Datasets built from production traces
  • Production logging and tracing
Weights & BiasesWeights & Biases
  • ML experiment tracking
  • Model and dataset versioning
  • Collaborative dashboards
  • Sweeps for hyperparameter tuning
  • Prompt monitoring and evaluation

Strengths and tradeoffs

What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.

BraintrustBraintrust

Pros

  • Unlimited users on every plan, including free
  • Production traces, datasets, and experiments connect in one eval workflow
  • Framework-agnostic SDKs across multiple languages
  • Loop agent drafts scorers and datasets from your own data

Cons

  • Processed data and scores bill separately, and both grow with eval volume
  • 14-day retention on Starter and 30 days on Pro
  • Gateway is in public preview with no SLA
  • Self-hosting and custom data export are Enterprise only
Weights & BiasesWeights & Biases

Pros

  • Free tier for personal projects and academic research provides excellent value
  • Comprehensive experiment tracking and model versioning capabilities
  • Strong visualization tools help teams understand model performance
  • Acquisition by CoreWeave provides infrastructure synergies and stability

Cons

  • Pricing can become expensive for large teams and enterprises
  • Additional storage costs can add up quickly for data-intensive workflows
  • Learning curve for advanced features may slow initial adoption
  • Platform complexity may be overkill for simple ML projects

Braintrust or Weights & — which should you choose?

Choose Braintrust if you want

  • Iterating on prompts with production data
  • Running evaluations across model versions
  • Building golden datasets from production traffic
  • Human review of LLM outputs

Choose Weights & if you want

  • ML experiment tracking and comparison
  • Model training run management
  • Team collaboration on ML projects
  • Hyperparameter optimization
  • Model registry and versioning

Compare Braintrust and Weights & Biases on your own traffic

10KFree traces/mo
1,000+Models
5 minSetup

Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 1,000+ models through one gateway.

Try Respan free

Other popular comparisons