DeepEval vs LangSmith (2026)
Updated March 10, 2026
Overview
DeepEval is an open-source LLM evaluation framework built for unit testing AI outputs. It provides 14+ evaluation metrics including hallucination detection, answer relevancy, and contextual recall. Integrates with pytest, supports custom metrics, and works with any LLM provider for automated quality assurance in CI/CD pipelines.
LangSmith is LangChain's platform for tracing, evaluating, and deploying AI agents. Compare its features, pricing, pros and cons, and alternatives.
Key features
Core capabilities each platform advertises.
- Native tracing for LangChain and LangGraph
- OpenTelemetry and multi-language SDKs
- Offline and online evaluations
- Annotation queues and datasets
- Prompt Hub with versioning
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- Open-source
- Comprehensive metrics
Cons
- Manual setup
Pros
- Native LangChain and LangGraph tracing with no extra instrumentation
- Evals, datasets, and annotation queues sit in the same workspace as traces
- Tracing, deployment, and sandboxes from one vendor
- Framework-agnostic SDKs and OpenTelemetry support
Cons
- Per-seat pricing on Plus, and the free plan allows one seat
- 14-day base retention, with longer retention billed at a higher rate
- LLM Gateway is still in beta
- Self-hosting and hybrid deployment are Enterprise only
DeepEval or LangSmith — which should you choose?
Choose DeepEval if you wantChoose if you want
Choose LangSmith if you wantChoose if you want
- Debugging LangChain and LangGraph agents
- Evaluating agent output against datasets
- Human review through annotation queues
- Deploying long-running agents
Compare DeepEval and LangSmith on your own traffic
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 1,000+ models through one gateway.
Try Respan free