Galileo AI vs LangSmith: Observability, Prompts & Evals Comparison
Compare Galileo AI and LangSmith side by side. Both are tools in the Observability, Prompts & Evals category.
Updated March 9, 2026
The short answer
Choose Galileo AI if generous free tier with 5,000 traces/month including Agent Reliability Platform.
Choose LangSmith if deep integration with LangChain framework provides unmatched observability for LangChain applications.
Want to compare Galileo AI and LangSmith on your own traffic?
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 250+ models through one gateway. Free tier covers 10K traces per month. Setup in 5 minutes, no credit card.
Quick Comparison
| Category | Observability, Prompts & Evals | Observability, Prompts & Evals |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Best For | AI teams who need to measure and improve the quality of their LLM outputs | LangChain developers who need integrated tracing, evaluation, and prompt management |
| Website | rungalileo.io | smith.langchain.com |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Use Cases |
|
|
Pros & Cons: Galileo AI vs LangSmith
- +Generous free tier with 5,000 traces/month including Agent Reliability Platform
- +Recognized as Gartner Cool Vendor demonstrating industry validation
- +Research-backed metrics providing scientific rigor to evaluations
- +Real-time observability with automated drift detection and alerting
- +Established team of 142 employees providing solid support capacity
- −Limited public information about advanced features and capabilities
- −Pro plan pricing jumps from free to $100/month with potential gaps for small teams
- −Less community-driven compared to open-source alternatives like Langfuse
- +Deep integration with LangChain framework provides unmatched observability for LangChain applications
- +Comprehensive evaluation capabilities with custom metrics and automated regression testing
- +Excellent tracing UI with detailed step-by-step execution visualization
- +Strong dataset management and annotation workflows for human feedback
- −Tight coupling to LangChain ecosystem limits flexibility for non-LangChain applications
- −UI scalability issues reported when working with very large datasets
- −Production testing limitations - relies primarily on production logs for test datasets
- −SaaS-only deployment with no self-hosting option may not suit all enterprise requirements
Pricing: Galileo AI vs LangSmith
- · 5,000 traces per month
- · 14-day retention
- · One seat
- · Basic evaluations
- · 100,000 traces (overage ~$0.50 per 1,000)
- · 400-day retention
- · Full evaluations
- · Custom dashboards
- · Custom trace volumes
- · Custom retention policies
- · SSO
- · Dedicated support
When to Choose Galileo AI vs LangSmith
- Monitoring LLM output quality
- Detecting and preventing hallucinations
- Evaluating RAG pipeline accuracy
- Debugging LangChain and LangGraph applications
- Prompt iteration and A/B testing
- LLM output evaluation and scoring
About Galileo AI
Galileo is an AI observability and evaluation platform designed to provide AI reliability for teams across the entire development lifecycle. The platform offers real-time observability that continuously evaluates systems in production, sending alerts if something goes wrong or if interactions drift from training data. Galileo provides powerful, research-backed metrics and evaluation-powered development workflows to help teams build, scale, monitor, and protect AI applications in real-time. The platform is recognized as a Gartner Cool Vendor and serves as a comprehensive solution for AI teams looking to ensure reliability and performance of their LLM applications. With the Agent Reliability Platform available as part of their free tier, Galileo makes advanced AI observability accessible to teams of all sizes. The platform emphasizes scalability, security, and premium support for enterprise customers while maintaining an approachable entry point through their generous free tier.
About LangSmith
LangSmith is LangChain's observability and evaluation platform for building production-grade LLM applications. Founded in July 2023 by Harrison Chase and Ankush Gola as part of the LangChain ecosystem, LangSmith provides comprehensive tracing of every LLM call, chain execution, and agent step with detailed visibility into inputs, outputs, latency, token usage, and cost. The platform includes annotation queues for human feedback, dataset management for systematic evaluation, and regression testing capabilities for prompt changes. With over 1 million developers using LangChain products globally, LangSmith has become the go-to debugging and monitoring tool for teams building with the LangChain framework, serving major enterprises including Klarna, LinkedIn, Replit, GitLab, Elastic, and Cisco.
What is Observability, Prompts & Evals?
Tools for monitoring LLM applications in production, managing and versioning prompts, and evaluating model outputs. Includes tracing, logging, cost tracking, prompt engineering platforms, automated evaluation frameworks, and human annotation workflows.
Browse all Observability, Prompts & Evalstools →Other Observability, Prompts & Evals Tools
More Observability, Prompts & Evals Comparisons
Run Observability, Prompts & Evals in production with Respan
One platform for routing, observability, tracing, and evals across every LLM provider.