Helicone vs Respan (2026)
Updated February 28, 2026
Overview
Helicone is an open-source LLM observability and proxy platform. By adding a single line of code, developers get request logging, cost tracking, caching, rate limiting, and analytics for their LLM applications. Helicone supports all major LLM providers and offers both proxy and async logging modes. Popular with startups for its generous free tier and simple integration.
Respan is LLM observability built into an AI router: nested traces for every agent run, evals on live production traffic, and a click from any score to its trace.
Key features
Core capabilities each platform advertises.
- Nested traces for every LLM call, tool run, and agent turn
- Threads for multi-turn sessions
- Online evals on live production traffic
- LLM-judge, code, and human evaluators
- Datasets from production logs and experiments at scale
- Monitors with Slack, email, and webhook alerts
- Prompt versioning and deployment without code changes
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- Open-source with 5.2K GitHub stars and strong community support
- Minimal latency overhead (under 1ms for self-hosted)
- Flexible deployment options including cloud-hosted, self-hosted, or SDK-only
- Y Combinator-backed with SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance
- No code changes required for AI Gateway features like caching and rate limiting
Cons
- Adds computational cost and one network hop for cloud deployment
- Limited pricing transparency on website
- May require infrastructure expertise for self-hosted setup
Pros
- Every score links to the trace that produced it
- Evals run on live production traffic, not only on test sets
- Built into the router, so there's no separate gateway to integrate
- Monitors alert the moment a metric breaches
- Unlimited seats on the free plan
Cons
- The free plan retains data for 7 days
- The free plan includes 1k scores and 2 evaluators
- Ingestion throughput is metered per tier, starting at 412 logs per minute on Free
Helicone or Respan — which should you choose?
Choose Helicone if you wantChoose if you want
Choose Respan if you wantChoose if you want
- Debugging agent failures down to the step that broke
- Catching quality regressions before users report them
- Turning production failures into test datasets
- Testing a prompt or model change against real cases before shipping
- Attributing LLM cost to each end customer
Compare Helicone and Respan on your own traffic
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 1,000+ models through one gateway.
Try Respan free