Langfuse vs Weights & Biases (2026)
Updated March 9, 2026
Overview
Langfuse is an open-source LLM engineering platform for tracing, evals, and prompt management, self-hosted or on Langfuse Cloud with a free plan.
Weights & Biases (W&B) is the leading experiment tracking and ML operations platform, now extended to LLM applications. W&B Traces provides observability for LLM pipelines, while W&B Weave offers evaluation and production monitoring. The platform also supports model training tracking, hyperparameter sweeps, and artifact management, making it a comprehensive MLOps solution.
Key features
Core capabilities each platform advertises.
- Tracing for LLM calls, tool runs, and agent steps
- Python and TypeScript SDKs plus OpenTelemetry
- LLM-as-a-judge and custom evaluations
- Datasets and experiments
- Prompt management and playground
- ML experiment tracking
- Model and dataset versioning
- Collaborative dashboards
- Sweeps for hyperparameter tuning
- Prompt monitoring and evaluation
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- MIT-licensed core, self-hostable with Docker Compose or Kubernetes
- Tracing, evals, and prompt management in one tool
- Unlimited users on paid cloud plans
- Free Hobby plan with 50k units a month
- Native SDKs plus OpenTelemetry for other languages
Cons
- No LLM gateway, so routing, failover, and spend limits need a separate tool
- Hobby plan keeps 30 days of data and caps at 2 users
- Enterprise SSO and RBAC need the $300/month Teams add-on on Pro
- Self-hosting means running and scaling Langfuse's services yourself
Pros
- Free tier for personal projects and academic research provides excellent value
- Comprehensive experiment tracking and model versioning capabilities
- Strong visualization tools help teams understand model performance
- Acquisition by CoreWeave provides infrastructure synergies and stability
Cons
- Pricing can become expensive for large teams and enterprises
- Additional storage costs can add up quickly for data-intensive workflows
- Learning curve for advanced features may slow initial adoption
- Platform complexity may be overkill for simple ML projects
Langfuse or Weights & — which should you choose?
Choose Langfuse if you wantChoose if you want
- Tracing and debugging LLM apps and agents
- Self-hosting LLM observability
- Versioning prompts across environments
- Scoring outputs with LLM judges and human review
Choose Weights & if you wantChoose if you want
- ML experiment tracking and comparison
- Model training run management
- Team collaboration on ML projects
- Hyperparameter optimization
- Model registry and versioning
Compare Langfuse and Weights & Biases on your own traffic
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 1,000+ models through one gateway.
Try Respan free