Opik vs Respan
Updated March 10, 2026
Overview
Opik by Comet is an open-source LLM evaluation and observability platform. It provides tracing, evaluation scoring, dataset management, and experiment tracking for LLM applications. Opik supports automated LLM-as-judge evaluations and integrates with popular frameworks like LangChain and LlamaIndex.
Respan provides comprehensive LLM observability with real-time monitoring, tracing, and debugging for AI applications in production. It tracks prompts, completions, latency, cost, and quality metrics across all LLM providers, with built-in evaluation tools, prompt management, and alerting. Respan gives engineering teams full visibility into their AI stack from a single dashboard.
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- Production-ready
- Good performance
- Active development
Cons
- Pricing varies
- Setup required
Pros
- Unified observability across all LLM providers in one dashboard
- Real-time alerting for cost spikes, latency, and quality issues
- Built-in evaluation tools for automated quality scoring
- Prompt management with versioning and A/B testing
- Easy integration with popular AI frameworks
Cons
- Newer platform building out integrations with more frameworks
- Advanced evaluation features require configuration effort
- Smaller community compared to established observability tools
Compare Opik and Respan on your own traffic
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 500+ models through one gateway.