Orthogonal vs Zatanna (2026)
Updated March 27, 2026
vs
Overview
Rating
10.0 / 10
Rating
10.0 / 10
Best For
Developers building agents that consume paid APIs
Best For
Teams connecting AI agents to software without APIs
Product Summary
Agentic payments for APIs — agents can discover, access, and pay for hundreds of APIs via MCP with no API key management.
Product Summary
Turns any software into agent-first APIs — reverse-engineers browser workflows into clean REST endpoints for AI agents.
Starting Price
Per API call (varies by provider)Per usage-based
Starting Price
Contact for pricing
Free Trial
Yes
Free Trial
No
Free Version
No
Free Version
No
Website
Website
Key features
Core capabilities each platform advertises.
- Agent API payments
- MCP integration
- No API key management
- Pay-per-use access
- API discovery for agents
- Browser workflow to API conversion
- Agent-callable endpoints
- No browser automation needed
- REST API generation
- Software reverse-engineering
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- Solves real friction — agents need API access without manual key management
- Strong founder backgrounds in payments (Coinbase, Vercel) and API infrastructure (Google)
- 30+ API partners already onboarded showing solid early supply-side traction
- MCP-native design aligns with the emerging agent protocol standard
- Pay-per-call model with no commitments is agent-friendly
Cons
- Marketplace cold-start problem needs both API providers and agent developers
- Commoditizable if major cloud providers build native agent API marketplaces
- No public revenue or usage metrics disclosed
- Thin margin business if acting purely as a payment pass-through
Pros
- Technically differentiated HTTP reconstruction approach is faster and more reliable than browser automation
- Large addressable market in enterprise legacy software integration
- No-code setup — show the workflow once, get a production API
- Already handling production traffic at scale with named customers
- Strong CTO with deep reverse engineering expertise
Cons
- No public pricing or self-serve access
- Competes with well-funded RPA incumbents like UiPath and Automation Anywhere
- Approach may break when target sites change underlying APIs
- Early-career founding team lacking enterprise GTM experience
Orthogonal or Zatanna — which should you choose?
Choose Orthogonal if you wantChoose if you want
- Agent API access
- Automated API procurement
- Agent tool marketplace
- Pay-per-use API consumption
Choose Zatanna if you wantChoose if you want
- API creation for agents
- Legacy software integration
- Browser automation replacement
- Agent tool creation
Compare Orthogonal and Zatanna on your own traffic
10KFree traces/mo
1,000+Models
5 minSetup
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 1,000+ models through one gateway.
Try Respan free