Cognee vs Zep
Updated March 10, 2026
Overview
Cognee is an open-source memory management framework for AI applications that builds knowledge graphs from unstructured data. It extracts entities, relationships, and facts from conversations and documents, enabling AI agents to maintain structured long-term memory with semantic retrieval.
Zep is a long-term memory service for AI assistants and agents. It stores conversation history, extracts facts and entities, builds temporal knowledge graphs, and enables semantic search across past interactions. Zep helps AI applications recall relevant context from previous conversations, making chatbots and agents feel more natural and personalized. Available as open-source and cloud-hosted.
Key features
Core capabilities each platform advertises.
- Memory infrastructure for AI assistants
- Dialog classification and extraction
- Integration with LangChain and LlamaIndex
- Structured and unstructured memory storage
- Memory search with temporal awareness
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- Production-ready
- Good performance
- Active development
Cons
- Pricing varies
- Setup required
Pros
- AI memory purpose-built
- 100k free messages
- Self-hosted option
Cons
- Message limits
- Scaling costs
Cognee or Zep — which should you choose?
Choose Cognee if you wantChoose if you want
Choose Zep if you wantChoose if you want
- Enterprise AI assistants with memory
- Customer service bots that remember past issues
- Personalized recommendation agents
- Multi-turn conversation management
- Context-aware AI applications
Compare Cognee and Zep on your own traffic
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 500+ models through one gateway.