Proxyon vs Spider
Updated March 10, 2026
Overview
Proxyon provides fast residential, datacenter, and IPv6 proxies purpose-built for web scraping and automation at scale. It operates on a pay-as-you-go model starting at $1.75/GB with no subscriptions required, supports HTTP and SOCKS5 protocols, and offers city-level geo-targeting across 150+ countries with unlimited concurrent connections and 99.9% uptime.
Spider is a high-performance web crawler built in Rust that can crawl thousands of pages per second. It provides LLM-ready output formats, JavaScript rendering, and anti-bot bypassing, making it ideal for large-scale web data collection for AI applications.
Key features
Core capabilities each platform advertises.
- Residential, datacenter, and IPv6 proxies
- Pay-as-you-go from $1.75/GB
- City-level geo-targeting in 150+ countries
- HTTP and SOCKS5 protocol support
- Unlimited concurrent connections, 99.9% uptime
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- Developer-friendly platform
- Production-ready
- Good performance
- Active development
Cons
- Enterprise pricing varies
- Setup complexity
- Learning curve
Pros
- Production-ready
- Good performance
- Active development
Cons
- Pricing varies
- Setup required
Proxyon or Spider — which should you choose?
Choose Proxyon if you wantChoose if you want
- Web scraping proxy infrastructure
- Anti-bot bypass for data collection
- Geo-targeted web data extraction
- Large-scale crawling infrastructure
- AI training data collection at scale
Choose Spider if you wantChoose if you want
Compare Proxyon and Spider on your own traffic
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 500+ models through one gateway.