Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen3.5-Plus

SpecClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen3.5-Plus
Respan Index19.0 (#124)19.4 (#122)
Blended price per 1M-$0.823
Context window200K1M
Input / output per 1M-$0.36 / $2.21
Max output128K-
Inputtext, visiontext, vision
Released2025-02-242026-02-15

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen3.5-Plus
Coding7.5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet7.2* Qwen3.5-Plus
Agents14.2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet4.8 Qwen3.5-Plus
Reasoning22.0 Claude 3.7 Sonnet27.7 Qwen3.5-Plus
Knowledge & language15.2* Claude 3.7 Sonnet25.4 Qwen3.5-Plus
Human preference43.7 Claude 3.7 Sonnet46.2* Qwen3.5-Plus

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Qwen3.5-Plus leads on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen3.5-Plus
GPQA Diamond79.7%84.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI)57.8%86.7%

FAQ

Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Qwen3.5-Plus?

Qwen3.5-Plus scores 19.4 on the Respan Index (#122), ahead of Claude 3.7 Sonnet at 19.0 (#124). Qwen3.5-Plus leads on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both report.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet accepts 200K tokens and Qwen3.5-Plus 1M tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.