Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

GLM-4.7 vs Inkling

SpecGLM-4.7Inkling
Respan Index32.2 (#74)32.0 (#75)
Blended price per 1M$0.738$1.76
Context window200K1M
Input / output per 1M$0.4 / $1.75$1 / $4.05
Max output131K-
Inputtexttext, vision, audio
Released2025-12-222026-07-15

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryGLM-4.7Inkling
Coding12.3* GLM-4.77.1 Inkling
Agents42.2 GLM-4.743.1 Inkling
Reasoning30.5 GLM-4.731.4 Inkling
Knowledge & language32.2 GLM-4.739.6 Inkling
Human preference51.5 GLM-4.751.0 Inkling

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Inkling leads on 5 of the 7 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Inkling
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI)21%21%
LMArena Elo14411442
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)14351415
GPQA Diamond83.3%88.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI)83.3%88.9%
SimpleQA Verified32.2%43.9%
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)47.7%50%

FAQ

Is GLM-4.7 better than Inkling?

GLM-4.7 scores 32.2 on the Respan Index (#74), ahead of Inkling at 32.0 (#75). Inkling leads on 5 of the 7 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7 or Inkling?

GLM-4.7 lists at $0.4 input and $1.75 output per 1M tokens; Inkling at $1 and $4.05. GLM-4.7 is 2.4x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

GLM-4.7 accepts 200K tokens and Inkling 1M tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.