Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Inkling-Small

SpecGPT-5.2-CodexInkling-Small
Respan Index29.7 (#83)29.4 (#84)
Blended price per 1M$4.81$0.637
Context window400K1M
Input / output per 1M$1.75 / $14$0.45 / $1.2
Max output128K-
Inputtext, visiontext, vision, audio
Released2025-12-182026-07-30

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryGPT-5.2-CodexInkling-Small
Coding18.3 GPT-5.2-Codex6.8 Inkling-Small
Agents21.5 GPT-5.2-Codex41.2 Inkling-Small
Reasoning35.7 GPT-5.2-Codex31.7 Inkling-Small
Knowledge & language34.5 GPT-5.2-Codex19.1 Inkling-Small
Human preference49.0 GPT-5.2-Codex50.6 Inkling-Small

How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Inkling-Small leads on 1 of the 1 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexInkling-Small
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)13391409

FAQ

Is GPT-5.2-Codex better than Inkling-Small?

GPT-5.2-Codex scores 29.7 on the Respan Index (#83), ahead of Inkling-Small at 29.4 (#84). Inkling-Small leads on 1 of the 1 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2-Codex or Inkling-Small?

GPT-5.2-Codex lists at $1.75 input and $14 output per 1M tokens; Inkling-Small at $0.45 and $1.2. Inkling-Small is 7.5x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.2-Codex accepts 400K tokens and Inkling-Small 1M tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.