Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

SpecMiniMax M1Qwen3 235B-A22B
Respan Index16.4 (#140)16.2 (#141)
Blended price per 1M$0.963-
Context window1M262K
Input / output per 1M$0.55 / $2.2-
Max output--
Inputtexttext
Released2025-06-162025-04-29

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryMiniMax M1Qwen3 235B-A22B
Coding3.2 MiniMax M14.4 Qwen3 235B-A22B
Agents13.5* MiniMax M111.9* Qwen3 235B-A22B
Reasoning20.2 MiniMax M119.3 Qwen3 235B-A22B
Knowledge & language11.7 MiniMax M110.6* Qwen3 235B-A22B
Human preference40.3 MiniMax M141.6 Qwen3 235B-A22B

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Qwen3 235B-A22B leads on 3 of the 3 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Elo13641375
AIME 202576.9%80.8%
GPQA Diamond70%70.7%

FAQ

Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?

MiniMax M1 scores 16.4 on the Respan Index (#140), ahead of Qwen3 235B-A22B at 16.2 (#141). Qwen3 235B-A22B leads on 3 of the 3 benchmarks both report.

Which has the larger context window?

MiniMax M1 accepts 1M tokens and Qwen3 235B-A22B 262K tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.