Make vs Trigger.dev: Workflow Automation Comparison
Compare Make and Trigger.dev side by side. Both are tools in the Workflow Automation category.
The short answer
Choose Make if powerful visual builder with superior handling of complex multi-step workflows and branching logic.
Choose Trigger.dev if true code-first approach with TypeScript, ideal for developers wanting full control.
Want to compare Make and Trigger.dev on your own traffic?
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 250+ models through one gateway. Free tier covers 10K traces per month. Setup in 5 minutes, no credit card.
Quick Comparison
| Category | Workflow Automation | Workflow Automation |
| Pricing | Freemium | — |
| Best For | Teams who need more complex automation logic than simple trigger-action tools provide | — |
| Website | make.com | trigger.dev |
| Key Features |
| — |
| Use Cases |
| — |
Pros & Cons: Make vs Trigger.dev
- +Powerful visual builder with superior handling of complex multi-step workflows and branching logic
- +3,000+ app integrations with advanced data transformation and HTTP/webhook capabilities
- +Cost-effective pricing, significantly cheaper than Zapier for complex automations
- +Built-in code environment for JavaScript and Python for advanced customization
- +Backed by $13B Celonis with enterprise-grade reliability and continuous innovation
- −Steeper learning curve than Zapier due to more complex interface and field mapping
- −Credit-based pricing system can be confusing to estimate costs accurately
- −Less suitable for complete beginners or non-technical users
- −Smaller community and fewer pre-built templates compared to Zapier
- +True code-first approach with TypeScript, ideal for developers wanting full control
- +No timeout limitations allowing long-running tasks to complete successfully
- +Apache 2.0 open-source license with strong community commitment
- +Human-in-the-loop capabilities for workflows requiring approval steps
- +Comprehensive tracing and logging for complete workflow observability
- −TypeScript-only, limiting options for teams using other languages
- −Requires developer expertise, not accessible to non-technical users
- −Small team (9 employees) may impact support response and feature development
- −Limited integrations and pre-built components compared to established platforms
When to Choose Make vs Trigger.dev
- Complex multi-step automations
- Marketing and sales workflow automation
- Data transformation pipelines
How to Choose a Workflow Automation Tool
Key criteria to evaluate when comparing Workflow Automation solutions:
About Make
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation and integration platform that enables users to design, build, and run workflows across more than 3,000 cloud applications and APIs without writing code using a scenario-based, drag-and-drop builder. Acquired by Celonis in 2020 for over $100M and rebranded from Integromat to Make in 2022, the platform provides a powerful visual way to build multi-step workflows with advanced flow control, rich data transformation, HTTP and webhook modules, and an embedded code environment for JavaScript and Python. Make now serves over 350,000 organizations in 200+ countries, from solopreneurs to global enterprises. The platform has evolved to include cutting-edge capabilities such as Make AI Agents, Maia (an AI-powered workflow builder), and Make Grid, a real-time visualization layer for an organization's entire automation landscape. Make is particularly valued for its combination of flexibility, depth of features, and cost-effective pricing for complex automations, making it ideal for operations, IT, and marketing teams comfortable with mapping fields and handling conditions.
About Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev is an open-source background jobs framework that enables developers to build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript. Founded in 2022 by Matt Aitken, Eric Allam, Dan Patel, and James Ritchie, and based in London, UK, Trigger.dev provides a developer-first platform that executes tasks with no timeouts while offering built-in durability, retries, queues, and idempotency. The platform allows developers to customize deployed tasks with system packages, enabling them to run browsers, Python scripts, FFmpeg, and more in production environments. Key features include human-in-the-loop functionality to programmatically pause tasks until humans can approve, reject, or give feedback, realtime apps with streaming capabilities to move background jobs to the foreground by subscribing to runs or streaming AI responses, and comprehensive full tracing and logs for each run. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, Trigger.dev is committed to open-source software and building with the community, having raised $3M in seed funding to support development.
What is Workflow Automation?
Platforms for building multi-step AI-powered automations that connect apps, APIs, and agents into repeatable business workflows.
Browse all Workflow Automationtools →Frequently Asked Questions
Other Workflow Automation Tools
More Workflow Automation Comparisons
Run Workflow Automation in production with Respan
One platform for routing, observability, tracing, and evals across every LLM provider.