Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8
| Spec | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 57.2 (#16) | 55.6 (#19) |
| Blended price per 1M | $0.1 | $10 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input / output per 1M | $0.05 / $0.25 | $5 / $25 |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input | text, vision | text, vision |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2026-05-28 |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 55.1 Claude Haiku 5.5 | 39.2 Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Agents | 66.0 Claude Haiku 5.5 | 64.6 Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Reasoning | 65.0 Claude Haiku 5.5 | 64.8 Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Knowledge & language | 23.6 Claude Haiku 5.5 | 52.4 Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Human preference | 55.5 Claude Haiku 5.5 | 55.0 Claude Opus 4.8 |
Benchmarks both report
Claude Opus 4.8 leads on 16 of the 26 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| MirrorCode (Epoch AI) | 78.9% | 65.6% |
| APEX-Agents (Mercor) | 56.1% | 48.9% |
| Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI) | 55% | 52% |
| LMArena Agent (LMArena) | 0.0143 | 0.0776 |
| LMArena Elo | 1425 | 1482 |
| LMArena WebDev (LMArena) | 1589 | 1556 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI) | 36.4% | 23.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs) | 3602.46 | 5787.43 |
| EBR-bench (Epoch AI) | 43.8% | 28.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI) | 46.3% | 56.1% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI) | 75.1% | 80% |
| Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI) | 47.5% | 42.5% |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | 93.6% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench) | 57.2% | 50.5% |
| LiveBench Coding (LiveBench) | 77.9% | 81.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench) | 72.8% | 66% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench) | 66.5% | 72% |
| LiveBench Language (LiveBench) | 63.5% | 79.7% |
| LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench) | 92.8% | 94.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench) | 84.6% | 89.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI) | 30% | 36% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI) | 98.9% | 98.3% |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 45.8% | 54.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | 53% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 45.9% | 49.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 57.4% | 57.9% |
FAQ
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Claude Opus 4.8?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores 57.2 on the Respan Index (#16), ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 at 55.6 (#19). Claude Opus 4.8 leads on 16 of the 26 benchmarks both report.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Claude Opus 4.8?
Claude Haiku 5.5 lists at $0.05 input and $0.25 output per 1M tokens; Claude Opus 4.8 at $5 and $25. Claude Haiku 5.5 is 100x cheaper per token at list price.
Which has the larger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens of context.
Compare other models
- vsClaude Opus 4.8 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B NVFP4
- vsClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- vsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- vsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- vsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Wonder
- vsClaude Opus 4.8 vs Step 5 Preview
- vsClaude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- vsClaude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro