Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
| Spec | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 57.2 (#16) | 56.1 (#17) |
| Blended price per 1M | $0.1 | $0.54 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input / output per 1M | $0.05 / $0.25 | $0.43 / $0.87 |
| Max output | 128K | - |
| Input | text, vision | text, vision, audio, video |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2026-09-21 |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 55.0 Claude Haiku 5.5 | 45.6 MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Agents | 65.9 Claude Haiku 5.5 | 64.7 MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Reasoning | 65.0 Claude Haiku 5.5 | 57.1 MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Knowledge & language | 23.6 Claude Haiku 5.5 | 58.2* MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Human preference | 55.5 Claude Haiku 5.5 | 56.5 MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works
Benchmarks both report
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads on 5 of the 8 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
FAQ
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores 57.2 on the Respan Index (#16), ahead of MiMo-V2.6-Pro at 56.1 (#17). Claude Haiku 5.5 leads on 5 of the 8 benchmarks both report.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Claude Haiku 5.5 lists at $0.05 input and $0.25 output per 1M tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.43 and $0.87. Claude Haiku 5.5 is 5.4x cheaper per token at list price.
Which has the larger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens of context.
Compare other models
- vsClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- vsClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- vsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- vsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Wonder
- vsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8
- vsMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Opus 4.8
- vsMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- vsMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3