Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

SpecDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Respan Index59.4 (#15)56.1 (#17)
Blended price per 1M$0.074$0.54
Context window1M1M
Input / output per 1M$0.035 / $0.192$0.43 / $0.87
Max output--
Inputtext, imagetext, vision, audio, video
Released2026-10-172026-09-21

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Coding47.7 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-101745.6 MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Agents76.8 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-101764.7 MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Reasoning61.5 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-101757.1 MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Knowledge & language42.6 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-101758.2* MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Human preference57.6* DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-101756.5 MiMo-V2.6-Pro

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 leads on 4 of the 4 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017MiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents (Mercor)69.8%54.4%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)31.8%31.3%
DeepSWE v1.177%71.9%
Terminal-Bench 4.042.3%34.9%

FAQ

Is DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 scores 59.4 on the Respan Index (#15), ahead of MiMo-V2.6-Pro at 56.1 (#17). DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 leads on 4 of the 4 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 lists at $0.035 input and $0.192 output per 1M tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.43 and $0.87. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is 7.3x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens of context.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.

Start for freeGet a demo