Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs Muse Wonder

SpecDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Muse Wonder
Respan Index59.4 (#15)61.4 (#14)
Blended price per 1M$0.074$8
Context window1M1.0M
Input / output per 1M$0.035 / $0.192$4 / $20
Max output--
Inputtext, imagetext, vision, video, audio
Released2026-10-172026-10-12

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Muse Wonder
Coding47.7 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-101748.7 Muse Wonder
Agents76.8 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-101766.7 Muse Wonder
Reasoning61.5 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-101772.7 Muse Wonder
Knowledge & language42.6 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-101757.9 Muse Wonder
Human preference57.6* DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-101757.5 Muse Wonder

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Muse Wonder leads on 6 of the 8 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Muse Wonder
APEX-Agents (Mercor)69.8%66.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI)46.3%70.7%
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI)71.2%82.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI)49%51%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI)99.4%99.4%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)31.8%49.5%
DeepSWE v1.177%78.8%
ProgramBench29.1%50%

FAQ

Is DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 better than Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder scores 61.4 on the Respan Index (#14), ahead of DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 at 59.4 (#15). Muse Wonder leads on 6 of the 8 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 or Muse Wonder?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 lists at $0.035 input and $0.192 output per 1M tokens; Muse Wonder at $4 and $20. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is 108x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 accepts 1M tokens and Muse Wonder 1.0M tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.