Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

SpecClaude Opus 5.5MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Respan Index73.7 (#1)51.8 (#31)
Blended price per 1M$4$0.131
Context window1M1M
Input / output per 1M$2 / $10$0.075 / $0.3
Max output128K-
Inputtext, visiontext, vision, video
Released2026-09-222026-10-19

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryClaude Opus 5.5MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Coding66.8 Claude Opus 5.540.7 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Agents79.2 Claude Opus 5.556.3 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Reasoning83.9 Claude Opus 5.555.4 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Knowledge & language70.4 Claude Opus 5.554.0* MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Human preference61.4 Claude Opus 5.555.5 MiniMax M3.1 Flash

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Claude Opus 5.5 leads on 4 of the 4 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SAGE 1.1 (Vals AI)91.3%85.3%
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.2094-0.0396
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)18101583
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)65.2%25.3%

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores 73.7 on the Respan Index (#1), ahead of MiniMax M3.1 Flash at 51.8 (#31). Claude Opus 5.5 leads on 4 of the 4 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Claude Opus 5.5 lists at $2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash at $0.075 and $0.3. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 30x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens of context.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.