Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Grok 4.7 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

SpecGrok 4.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Respan Index52.1 (#28)51.8 (#31)
Blended price per 1M$3$0.197
Context window500K1M
Input / output per 1M$2 / $6$0.113 / $0.45
Max output--
Inputtext, visiontext, vision, video
Released2026-09-212026-10-19

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryGrok 4.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Coding43.4 Grok 4.740.7 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Agents65.3 Grok 4.756.3 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Reasoning43.4 Grok 4.755.4 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Knowledge & language55.5 Grok 4.754.0* MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Human preference56.7 Grok 4.755.5 MiniMax M3.1 Flash

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Grok 4.7 leads on 4 of the 5 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SAGE 1.1 (Vals AI)88.7%85.3%
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0239-0.0396
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)16381583
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)28.8%25.3%
DeepSWE v1.171%73.7%

FAQ

Is Grok 4.7 better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Grok 4.7 scores 52.1 on the Respan Index (#28), ahead of MiniMax M3.1 Flash at 51.8 (#31). Grok 4.7 leads on 4 of the 5 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Grok 4.7 lists at $2 input and $6 output per 1M tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash at $0.113 and $0.45. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 15x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.7 accepts 500K tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash 1M tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.