Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

SpecClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Respan Index49.5 (#33)51.8 (#31)
Blended price per 1M$10$0.131
Context window1M1M
Input / output per 1M$5 / $25$0.075 / $0.3
Max output128K-
Inputtext, visiontext, vision, video
Released2026-04-162026-10-19

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Coding29.8 Claude Opus 4.740.7 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Agents61.2 Claude Opus 4.756.3 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Reasoning54.1 Claude Opus 4.755.4 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Knowledge & language49.9 Claude Opus 4.754.0* MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Human preference55.2 Claude Opus 4.755.5 MiniMax M3.1 Flash

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads on 1 of the 1 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)15581583

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores 51.8 on the Respan Index (#31), ahead of Claude Opus 4.7 at 49.5 (#33). MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads on 1 of the 1 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Claude Opus 4.7 lists at $5 input and $25 output per 1M tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash at $0.075 and $0.3. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 76x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens of context.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.