Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Respan Index72.9 (#2)51.8 (#31)
Blended price per 1M$2$0.131
Context window1M1M
Input / output per 1M$1 / $5$0.075 / $0.3
Max output128K-
Inputtext, visiontext, vision, video
Released2026-09-282026-10-19

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Coding78.6 Claude Sonnet 5.540.7 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Agents78.5 Claude Sonnet 5.556.3 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Reasoning79.0 Claude Sonnet 5.555.4 MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Knowledge & language48.5 Claude Sonnet 5.554.0* MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Human preference60.2 Claude Sonnet 5.555.5 MiniMax M3.1 Flash

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads on 4 of the 4 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SAGE 1.1 (Vals AI)88%85.3%
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1384-0.0396
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)17701583
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)64.1%25.3%

FAQ

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 72.9 on the Respan Index (#2), ahead of MiniMax M3.1 Flash at 51.8 (#31). Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads on 4 of the 4 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $1 input and $5 output per 1M tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash at $0.075 and $0.3. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 15x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens of context.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.