Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.6 Luna
| Spec | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 43.9 (#51) | 48.8 (#37) |
| Blended price per 1M | $2.25 | $0.225 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.1M |
| Input / output per 1M | $1 / $6 | $0.1 / $0.6 |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input | text, vision, audio | text, vision |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | 2026-07-09 |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 15.6 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 27.8 GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Agents | 53.6 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 56.9 GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Reasoning | 46.2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 62.6 GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Knowledge & language | 72.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 38.7 GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Human preference | 52.2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 53.8 GPT-5.6 Luna |
Benchmarks both report
They split the 28 benchmarks both report evenly. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents (Mercor) | 35.1% | 43% |
| Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI) | 51% | 43% |
| LMArena Agent (LMArena) | -0.0445 | -0.0081 |
| LMArena Elo | 1487 | 1453 |
| LMArena WebDev (LMArena) | 1447 | 1519 |
| LMArena Vision (LMArena) | 1280 | 1257 |
| DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve) | 11.7% | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI) | 26.8% | 61% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI) | 59.6% | 82.1% |
| Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI) | 26.7% | 42.5% |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.3% | 92.3% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench) | 44.1% | 48.4% |
| LiveBench Coding (LiveBench) | 76.5% | 82.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench) | 78.5% | 78% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench) | 79.1% | 60.1% |
| LiveBench Language (LiveBench) | 85.4% | 72.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench) | 91% | 87.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench) | 84% | 85.6% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI) | 34% | 21% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI) | 95.6% | 98.3% |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 48.7% | 44.2% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | 41% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI) | 2.5% | 11.6% |
| Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs) | 3774.25 | 4094.71 |
| WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle) | 72.1% | 60.9% |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 54.2% | 62.7% |
| BALROG (BALROG) | 57% | 45.6% |
| SimpleBench (SimpleBench) | 79.6% | 46.8% |
FAQ
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna scores 48.8 on the Respan Index (#37), ahead of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 43.9 (#51). They split the 28 benchmarks both report evenly.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists at $1 input and $6 output per 1M tokens; GPT-5.6 Luna at $0.1 and $0.6. GPT-5.6 Luna is 10x cheaper per token at list price.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts 1.0M tokens and GPT-5.6 Luna 1.1M tokens.
Compare other models
- vsClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- vsGPT-6.1 Sol vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- vsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- vsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7-Max
- vsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
- vsGPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna
- vsGPT-5.6 Luna vs Hy4 preview
- vsGPT-5.6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4 Pro