GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3.7-Plus
| Spec | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3.7-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 36.6 (#66) | 36.6 (#66) |
| Blended price per 1M | $1.34 | $0.403 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Input / output per 1M | $0.825 / $2.9 | $0.23 / $0.92 |
| Max output | 131K | - |
| Input | text | text, vision |
| Released | 2026-04-07 | 2026-05-26 |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3.7-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 13.0 GLM-5.1 | 15.3* Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Agents | 53.9 GLM-5.1 | 50.4 Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Reasoning | 33.7 GLM-5.1 | 35.2 Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Knowledge & language | 34.0 GLM-5.1 | 33.2* Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Human preference | 53.6 GLM-5.1 | 53.7 Qwen3.7-Plus |
* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works
Benchmarks both report
GLM-5.1 leads on 3 of the 5 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
FAQ
Is GLM-5.1 better than Qwen3.7-Plus?
GLM-5.1 and Qwen3.7-Plus tie on the Respan Index at 36.6. GLM-5.1 leads on 3 of the 5 benchmarks both report.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.7-Plus?
GLM-5.1 lists at $0.825 input and $2.9 output per 1M tokens; Qwen3.7-Plus at $0.23 and $0.92. Qwen3.7-Plus is 3.3x cheaper per token at list price.
Which has the larger context window?
GLM-5.1 accepts 200K tokens and Qwen3.7-Plus 1M tokens.