GPT-4.1 nano vs Llama 4 Scout
| Spec | GPT-4.1 nano | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 11.1 (#155) | 10.8 (#156) |
| Blended price per 1M | $0.175 | $0.15 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 10M |
| Input / output per 1M | $0.1 / $0.4 | $0.1 / $0.3 |
| Max output | 33K | - |
| Input | text, vision | text, vision |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2025-04-05 |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | GPT-4.1 nano | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1.3 GPT-4.1 nano | 0.7* Llama 4 Scout |
| Agents | 4.1* GPT-4.1 nano | 3.4* Llama 4 Scout |
| Reasoning | 17.3 GPT-4.1 nano | 16.4 Llama 4 Scout |
| Knowledge & language | 6.0 GPT-4.1 nano | 4.8 Llama 4 Scout |
| Human preference | 32.0 GPT-4.1 nano | 34.3 Llama 4 Scout |
* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works
Benchmarks both report
GPT-4.1 nano leads on 3 of the 5 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
FAQ
Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4.1 nano scores 11.1 on the Respan Index (#155), ahead of Llama 4 Scout at 10.8 (#156). GPT-4.1 nano leads on 3 of the 5 benchmarks both report.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4.1 nano lists at $0.1 input and $0.4 output per 1M tokens; Llama 4 Scout at $0.1 and $0.3. Llama 4 Scout is 1.2x cheaper per token at list price.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-4.1 nano accepts 1.0M tokens and Llama 4 Scout 10M tokens.