Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3 30B-A3B

SpecGranite 4.2 8BQwen3 30B-A3B
Respan Index15.2 (#149)14.8 (#151)
Blended price per 1M$0.082$0.215
Context window131K131K
Input / output per 1M$0.06 / $0.15$0.12 / $0.5
Max output--
Inputtexttext
Released2026-08-252025-04-29

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryGranite 4.2 8BQwen3 30B-A3B
Coding3.3 Granite 4.2 8B3.0 Qwen3 30B-A3B
Agents14.4* Granite 4.2 8B11.1* Qwen3 30B-A3B
Reasoning22.1 Granite 4.2 8B19.8 Qwen3 30B-A3B
Knowledge & language5.4 Granite 4.2 8B9.9* Qwen3 30B-A3B
Human preference31.3 Granite 4.2 8B35.5 Qwen3 30B-A3B

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

They split the 2 benchmarks both report evenly. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

FAQ

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Qwen3 30B-A3B?

Granite 4.2 8B scores 15.2 on the Respan Index (#149), ahead of Qwen3 30B-A3B at 14.8 (#151). They split the 2 benchmarks both report evenly.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3 30B-A3B?

Granite 4.2 8B lists at $0.06 input and $0.15 output per 1M tokens; Qwen3 30B-A3B at $0.12 and $0.5. Granite 4.2 8B is 2.6x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens of context.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.