Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Granite 4.2 8B vs Llama 4 Maverick

SpecGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 Maverick
Respan Index15.2 (#149)14.3 (#152)
Blended price per 1M$0.082$0.304
Context window131K1M
Input / output per 1M$0.06 / $0.15$0.188 / $0.652
Max output--
Inputtexttext, vision
Released2026-08-252025-04-05

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 Maverick
Coding3.3 Granite 4.2 8B2.2 Llama 4 Maverick
Agents14.4* Granite 4.2 8B9.9* Llama 4 Maverick
Reasoning22.1 Granite 4.2 8B19.4 Llama 4 Maverick
Knowledge & language5.4 Granite 4.2 8B10.5 Llama 4 Maverick
Human preference31.3 Granite 4.2 8B36.1 Llama 4 Maverick

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Llama 4 Maverick leads on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

FAQ

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Llama 4 Maverick?

Granite 4.2 8B scores 15.2 on the Respan Index (#149), ahead of Llama 4 Maverick at 14.3 (#152). Llama 4 Maverick leads on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Llama 4 Maverick?

Granite 4.2 8B lists at $0.06 input and $0.15 output per 1M tokens; Llama 4 Maverick at $0.188 and $0.652. Granite 4.2 8B is 3.7x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B accepts 131K tokens and Llama 4 Maverick 1M tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.