Which has the larger context window?

MiniMax M2.7 accepts 205K tokens and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 262K tokens.

Models

Specs, pricing, and capabilities for every model on the Respan gateway.

MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: benchmarks, price and context | Respan

MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B scores 24.9 on the Respan Index (#82), ahead of MiniMax M2.7 at 24.8 (#83). MiniMax M2.7 leads on 1 of the 1 benchmarks both report. Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has the larger context window (262K tokens).

MiniMax M2.7MiniMax

Respan Index: 24.8 (#83)
Input / output per 1M: $0.3 / $1.2
Blended price per 1M: $0.525
Context window: 205K
Max output: -
Input: text
Released: 2026-03-18

Prices and providers on Respan

Respan Index by category

Coding5.0 MiniMax M2.74.2 Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
Agents39.3 MiniMax M2.732.9* Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
Reasoning16.4* MiniMax M2.7

Benchmarks both report

Benchmark	MiniMax M2.7	Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)	37%	34.5%

Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

Models

Models

MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

Respan Index by category

Benchmarks both report

FAQ

Compare other models

Models

Models

Respan Index by category

Benchmarks both report

FAQ

Is MiniMax M2.7 better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Which has the larger context window?

Compare other models