Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Muse Spark Open vs Qwen3.8 27B

SpecMuse Spark OpenQwen3.8 27B
Respan Index42.8 (#53)42.1 (#54)
Blended price per 1M$2$0.154
Context window1.0M262K
Input / output per 1M$1.25 / $4.25$0.039 / $0.5
Max output--
Inputtext, vision, video, audiotext, vision
Released2026-10-152026-08-14

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryMuse Spark OpenQwen3.8 27B
Coding21.7 Muse Spark Open23.6 Qwen3.8 27B
Agents44.5 Muse Spark Open56.1 Qwen3.8 27B
Reasoning50.1 Muse Spark Open39.3 Qwen3.8 27B
Knowledge & language56.6 Muse Spark Open40.5 Qwen3.8 27B
Human preference54.0 Muse Spark Open55.4 Qwen3.8 27B

How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Qwen3.8 27B leads on 3 of the 3 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3.8 27B
APEX-Agents (Mercor)33.4%47.5%
GPQA Diamond89%89.2%
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)15261590

FAQ

Is Muse Spark Open better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Muse Spark Open scores 42.8 on the Respan Index (#53), ahead of Qwen3.8 27B at 42.1 (#54). Qwen3.8 27B leads on 3 of the 3 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark Open or Qwen3.8 27B?

Muse Spark Open lists at $1.25 input and $4.25 output per 1M tokens; Qwen3.8 27B at $0.039 and $0.5. Qwen3.8 27B is 13x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Muse Spark Open accepts 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8 27B 262K tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.