E2B vs Manufact
Updated March 10, 2026
Overview
E2B provides secure cloud sandboxes for AI agents to execute code.
Manufact (formerly mcp-use) provides an open-source SDK for building and deploying MCP-connected AI agents with minimal code. It handles the complexity of deploying AI systems safely in production, enabling developers to connect agents to any MCP server and tool ecosystem in just a few lines of code. Raised $6.3M seed led by Peak XV with backing from Y Combinator and Pioneer Fund.
Key features
Core capabilities each platform advertises.
- Open-source MCP agent SDK
- Deploy MCP agents with minimal code
- Production-safe agent deployment
- Universal MCP server connectivity
- YC-backed, $6.3M seed funding
Strengths and tradeoffs
What each tool does well, and the limitations to keep in mind.
Pros
- Secure isolated sandboxes for untrusted code
- Instant startup enables responsive apps
- Free tier for getting started
- Self-hosted option for enterprises
Cons
- Usage costs accumulate with scale
- Limited language support vs general compute
- Pricing details require consultation
Pros
- Specialized for space hardware and deep tech manufacturing
- Free academic tier for research and learning
- Affordable developer tier at €25/month
- Enterprise on-premises deployment available
Cons
- Niche focus limits broader applicability
- Pricing in EUR may affect international customers
- Limited public information about capabilities
E2B or Manufact — which should you choose?
Choose E2B if you wantChoose if you want
Choose Manufact if you wantChoose if you want
- Building MCP-connected AI agents
- Rapid agent prototyping with MCP tools
- Production MCP agent deployment
- Connecting agents to external tool ecosystems
- Open-source MCP infrastructure
Compare E2B and Manufact on your own traffic
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 500+ models through one gateway.