Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro
Respan Index73.1 (#2)71.1 (#4)
Blended price per 1M$2$3.6
Context window1M1.0M
Input / output per 1M$1 / $5$1.8 / $9
Max output128K1.0M
Inputtext, visiontext, vision, video
Released2026-09-282026-10-23

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryClaude Sonnet 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro
Coding79.6 Claude Sonnet 5.567.8 Kimi K3.1 Pro
Agents78.4 Claude Sonnet 5.569.3 Kimi K3.1 Pro
Reasoning79.0 Claude Sonnet 5.583.6* Kimi K3.1 Pro
Knowledge & language48.5 Claude Sonnet 5.571.2* Kimi K3.1 Pro
Human preference60.2 Claude Sonnet 5.558.5 Kimi K3.1 Pro

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads on 4 of the 4 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.13840.0596
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)17701695
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)64.1%63.6%
Terminal-Bench 4.070.6%65.7%

FAQ

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 73.1 on the Respan Index (#2), ahead of Kimi K3.1 Pro at 71.1 (#4). Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads on 4 of the 4 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $1 input and $5 output per 1M tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro at $1.8 and $9. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 1.8x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts 1M tokens and Kimi K3.1 Pro 1.0M tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.