Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

DeepSeek R1 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

SpecDeepSeek R1Gemma 4 26B A4B
Respan Index18.1 (#132)18.4 (#131)
Blended price per 1M$1.15-
Context window128K256K
Input / output per 1M$0.7 / $2.5$0 / $0
Max output33K-
Inputtexttext, vision
Released2025-01-202026-04-02

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryDeepSeek R1Gemma 4 26B A4B
Coding3.9 DeepSeek R14.4 Gemma 4 26B A4B
Agents14.4 DeepSeek R113.7* Gemma 4 26B A4B
Reasoning20.4 DeepSeek R120.1 Gemma 4 26B A4B
Knowledge & language16.7 DeepSeek R114.0 Gemma 4 26B A4B
Human preference44.7 DeepSeek R149.6 Gemma 4 26B A4B

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Gemma 4 26B A4B leads on 3 of the 5 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkDeepSeek R1Gemma 4 26B A4B
GPQA Diamond71.5%82.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI)53.3%82.2%
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)36.5%35.2%
LMArena Elo13981438
MMLU-Pro84%82.6%

FAQ

Is DeepSeek R1 better than Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B scores 18.4 on the Respan Index (#131), ahead of DeepSeek R1 at 18.1 (#132). Gemma 4 26B A4B leads on 3 of the 5 benchmarks both report.

Which has the larger context window?

DeepSeek R1 accepts 128K tokens and Gemma 4 26B A4B 256K tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.