DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
| Spec | DeepSeek R1 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 18.1 (#132) | 18.5 (#130) |
| Blended price per 1M | $1.15 | $0.158 |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Input / output per 1M | $0.7 / $2.5 | $0.057 / $0.459 |
| Max output | 33K | - |
| Input | text | text, vision |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | - |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | DeepSeek R1 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 3.9 DeepSeek R1 | 1.1 Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
| Agents | 14.4 DeepSeek R1 | 16.2* Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
| Reasoning | 20.4 DeepSeek R1 | 23.1 Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
| Knowledge & language | 16.7 DeepSeek R1 | 14.2* Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
| Human preference | 44.7 DeepSeek R1 | 46.6 Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works
Benchmarks both report
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads on 2 of the 3 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 71.5% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI) | 53.3% | 70% |
| LMArena Elo | 1398 | 1394 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek R1 better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores 18.5 on the Respan Index (#130), ahead of DeepSeek R1 at 18.1 (#132). Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads on 2 of the 3 benchmarks both report.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?
DeepSeek R1 lists at $0.7 input and $2.5 output per 1M tokens; Qwen3.5 35B-A3B at $0.057 and $0.459. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is 7.3x cheaper per token at list price.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek R1 accepts 128K tokens and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 262K tokens.