Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
| Spec | Gemma 4 31B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 18.6 (#128) | 18.5 (#130) |
| Blended price per 1M | - | $0.158 |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Input / output per 1M | $0 / $0 | $0.057 / $0.459 |
| Max output | - | - |
| Input | text, vision | text, vision |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | - |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 8.0 Gemma 4 31B | 1.1 Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
| Agents | 12.7* Gemma 4 31B | 16.2* Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
| Reasoning | 19.4 Gemma 4 31B | 23.1 Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
| Knowledge & language | 10.8 Gemma 4 31B | 14.2* Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
| Human preference | 50.0 Gemma 4 31B | 46.6 Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works
Benchmarks both report
Gemma 4 31B leads on 4 of the 6 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
FAQ
Is Gemma 4 31B better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?
Gemma 4 31B scores 18.6 on the Respan Index (#128), ahead of Qwen3.5 35B-A3B at 18.5 (#130). Gemma 4 31B leads on 4 of the 6 benchmarks both report.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemma 4 31B accepts 256K tokens and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 262K tokens.