Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

SpecDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Respan Index18.6 (#128)18.5 (#130)
Blended price per 1M$0.425$0.158
Context window128K262K
Input / output per 1M$0.25 / $0.95$0.057 / $0.459
Max output--
Inputtexttext, vision
Released2025-08-21-

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Coding4.9 DeepSeek V3.11.1 Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Agents11.3 DeepSeek V3.116.2* Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Reasoning23.9 DeepSeek V3.123.1 Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Knowledge & language14.4* DeepSeek V3.114.2* Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Human preference47.3 DeepSeek V3.146.6 Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

DeepSeek V3.1 leads on 1 of the 1 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V3.1 better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

DeepSeek V3.1 scores 18.6 on the Respan Index (#128), ahead of Qwen3.5 35B-A3B at 18.5 (#130). DeepSeek V3.1 leads on 1 of the 1 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

DeepSeek V3.1 lists at $0.25 input and $0.95 output per 1M tokens; Qwen3.5 35B-A3B at $0.057 and $0.459. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is 2.7x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

DeepSeek V3.1 accepts 128K tokens and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 262K tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.