Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs MiniMax M2.7

SpecGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteMiniMax M2.7
Respan Index27.0 (#92)27.0 (#92)
Blended price per 1M$0.281$0.032
Context window1.0M205K
Input / output per 1M$0.125 / $0.75$0.018 / $0.072
Max output66K-
Inputtext, vision, audiotext
Released2026-03-032026-03-18

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteMiniMax M2.7
Coding9.6 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite4.8 MiniMax M2.7
Agents27.5* Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite39.7 MiniMax M2.7
Reasoning29.4 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite25.1* MiniMax M2.7
Knowledge & language33.8 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite20.7* MiniMax M2.7
Human preference46.9 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite50.4 MiniMax M2.7

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads on 2 of the 3 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteMiniMax M2.7
LMArena Elo14331415
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)12561398
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)52.2%37%

FAQ

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite better than MiniMax M2.7?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and MiniMax M2.7 tie on the Respan Index at 27.0. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads on 2 of the 3 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or MiniMax M2.7?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite lists at $0.125 input and $0.75 output per 1M tokens; MiniMax M2.7 at $0.018 and $0.072. MiniMax M2.7 is 8.9x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite accepts 1.0M tokens and MiniMax M2.7 205K tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.