Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Muse Glimmer

SpecGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
Respan Index30.0 (#81)29.8 (#82)
Blended price per 1M$0.425$0.35
Context window1.0M131K
Input / output per 1M$0.15 / $1.25$0.2 / $0.8
Max output66K-
Inputtext, vision, audiotext, vision
Released2026-07-212026-08-10

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
Coding6.2 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite10.7 Muse Glimmer
Agents44.0 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite42.5 Muse Glimmer
Reasoning25.8 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite27.1 Muse Glimmer
Knowledge & language32.1 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite23.6* Muse Glimmer
Human preference51.7 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite49.4 Muse Glimmer

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
LMArena Elo14561425
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)14341355

FAQ

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite better than Muse Glimmer?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores 30.0 on the Respan Index (#81), ahead of Muse Glimmer at 29.8 (#82). Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Muse Glimmer?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite lists at $0.15 input and $1.25 output per 1M tokens; Muse Glimmer at $0.2 and $0.8. Muse Glimmer is 1.2x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1.0M tokens and Muse Glimmer 131K tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.