Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
| Spec | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 29.8 (#82) | 29.8 (#82) |
| Blended price per 1M | $0.35 | $0.387 |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Input / output per 1M | $0.2 / $0.8 | $0.172 / $1.03 |
| Max output | - | - |
| Input | text, vision | text, vision |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2026-02-15 |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 10.7 Muse Glimmer | 11.4 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
| Agents | 42.5 Muse Glimmer | 34.2 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
| Reasoning | 27.1 Muse Glimmer | 31.3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
| Knowledge & language | 23.6* Muse Glimmer | 29.6 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
| Human preference | 49.4 Muse Glimmer | 50.7 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works
Benchmarks both report
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads on 3 of the 4 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Elo | 1425 | 1441 |
| LMArena WebDev (LMArena) | 1355 | 1400 |
| AIME 2026 | 94.7% | 94.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76% | 76.4% |
FAQ
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?
Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B tie on the Respan Index at 29.8. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads on 3 of the 4 benchmarks both report.
Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?
Muse Glimmer lists at $0.2 input and $0.8 output per 1M tokens; Qwen3.5 397B-A17B at $0.172 and $1.03. Muse Glimmer is 1.1x cheaper per token at list price.
Which has the larger context window?
Muse Glimmer accepts 131K tokens and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 262K tokens.