Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer

SpecInkling-SmallMuse Glimmer
Respan Index29.4 (#85)29.8 (#82)
Blended price per 1M$0.637$0.35
Context window1M131K
Input / output per 1M$0.45 / $1.2$0.2 / $0.8
Max output--
Inputtext, vision, audiotext, vision
Released2026-07-302026-08-10

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryInkling-SmallMuse Glimmer
Coding6.8 Inkling-Small10.7 Muse Glimmer
Agents41.0 Inkling-Small42.5 Muse Glimmer
Reasoning31.7 Inkling-Small27.1 Muse Glimmer
Knowledge & language19.1 Inkling-Small23.6* Muse Glimmer
Human preference50.6 Inkling-Small49.4 Muse Glimmer

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Inkling-Small leads on 4 of the 5 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkInkling-SmallMuse Glimmer
LMArena Elo14061425
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)14091355
AIME 202695.5%94.7%
IFBench82.2%77%
SWE-bench Verified80.2%76%

FAQ

Is Inkling-Small better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer scores 29.8 on the Respan Index (#82), ahead of Inkling-Small at 29.4 (#85). Inkling-Small leads on 4 of the 5 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Inkling-Small or Muse Glimmer?

Inkling-Small lists at $0.45 input and $1.2 output per 1M tokens; Muse Glimmer at $0.2 and $0.8. Muse Glimmer is 1.8x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Inkling-Small accepts 1M tokens and Muse Glimmer 131K tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.