GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
| Spec | GLM-5.3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 52.1 (#28) | 52.6 (#27) |
| Blended price per 1M | $0.399 | $0.118 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input / output per 1M | $0.065 / $1.4 | $0.11 / $0.14 |
| Max output | 131K | - |
| Input | text | text, vision, audio, video |
| Released | 2026-08-18 | 2026-09-21 |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | GLM-5.3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 44.6 GLM-5.3 | 40.2 MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Agents | 64.1 GLM-5.3 | 63.1 MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Reasoning | 48.8 GLM-5.3 | 51.1 MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Knowledge & language | 42.3 GLM-5.3 | 55.2* MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Human preference | 56.6 GLM-5.3 | 56.7 MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works
Benchmarks both report
They split the 6 benchmarks both report evenly. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
FAQ
Is GLM-5.3 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 52.6 on the Respan Index (#27), ahead of GLM-5.3 at 52.1 (#28). They split the 6 benchmarks both report evenly.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
GLM-5.3 lists at $0.065 input and $1.4 output per 1M tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash at $0.11 and $0.14. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.4x cheaper per token at list price.
Which has the larger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens of context.