MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Max
| Spec | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 52.6 (#27) | 52.9 (#26) |
| Blended price per 1M | $0.118 | $2.48 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input / output per 1M | $0.11 / $0.14 | $1.65 / $4.95 |
| Max output | - | 131K |
| Input | text, vision, audio, video | text, vision |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-08-02 |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 40.2 MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 40.2 Qwen3.8-Max |
| Agents | 63.1 MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 68.1 Qwen3.8-Max |
| Reasoning | 51.1 MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 49.4 Qwen3.8-Max |
| Knowledge & language | 55.2* MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 48.1 Qwen3.8-Max |
| Human preference | 56.7 MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 57.9 Qwen3.8-Max |
* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works
Benchmarks both report
Qwen3.8-Max leads on 5 of the 8 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
FAQ
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Qwen3.8-Max?
Qwen3.8-Max scores 52.9 on the Respan Index (#26), ahead of MiMo-V2.6-Flash at 52.6 (#27). Qwen3.8-Max leads on 5 of the 8 benchmarks both report.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3.8-Max?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists at $0.11 input and $0.14 output per 1M tokens; Qwen3.8-Max at $1.65 and $4.95. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 21x cheaper per token at list price.
Which has the larger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens of context.